Hugo Boss rejoins Pakistan Accord, reversing its decision

Hugo Boss will re-enter the Pakistan Accord, the legally binding factory safety agreement it declined to renew when the pact was extended at the start of this year. A company spokesperson confirmed the return takes effect from January 2027, ending an eleven-month standoff with unions and labour groups.

The German fashion brand had been an original signatory when the Pakistan Accord launched in 2023. But when the agreement was extended on 1 January 2026, with automatic renewal through 31 December 2029, Hugo Boss chose not to recommit. That decision drew immediate criticism from IndustriALL Global Union, which called it “completely unacceptable.”

“Following a comprehensive review and extensive dialogue with the Accord, industry peers, and our suppliers, we have decided to re-enter the Pakistan Accord effective January 2027,” the spokesperson told Sourcing Journal. The company said it valued the constructive dialogue and the Accord’s openness to stakeholder feedback as it evolves.

Hugo Boss said the aim is to support the agreement’s continued development while strengthening worker safety and responsible sourcing across its supply chain. The brand, known for apparel, accessories and fragrances, had insisted at the time of its exit that it remained “firmly committed” to human rights and safe conditions, and would continue due diligence measures in Pakistan.

The Accord's origins

The Pakistan Accord sits within the broader International Accord for Health and Safety in the Garment and Textile Industry, which grew out of the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. The original was forged after the 2013 Rana Plaza collapse killed more than 1,130 workers, the deadliest accident in garment industry history.

Pakistan followed as a natural next step, having suffered its own disasters. Months before Rana Plaza, a fire at Ali Enterprises in Karachi killed 260 workers making denim, knitwear and hosiery and injured more than 50. The Accord combines independent inspections with binding commitments on brands, making it effectively the strongest safety mechanism available.

Pressure from labour groups

Labour groups sparred with Hugo Boss through the year. The Clean Clothes Campaign, the garment industry’s largest consortium of unions and civil society groups, described the company’s non-renewal statement as “wishy washy.” Inspection reports showed remediation at eight factories contracted by Hugo Boss was still at the beginning stage.

Those reports flagged unresolved issues including lockable gates and blocked exits, both potentially life-threatening. The Clean Clothes Campaign argued Hugo Boss had a duty not only to see the risks addressed but to ensure its suppliers could afford the repairs required to close them.

Nasir Mansoor, deputy general secretary at the National Trade Union Federation in Pakistan, said at the time that brands failing to renew were knowingly refusing to take part in the remediation needed to keep garment workers safe. His criticism landed as Hugo Boss faced renewed scrutiny in June over an injury at a Pakistani mill.

A worker at Arctic Textile Mills in Faisalabad lost an arm clearing jammed machinery. Factory workers had seen Hugo Boss labels on fabric rolls produced at the mill. Public records show Arctic Textile Mills has no direct relationship with Hugo Boss, but supplies yarn and fabric to Beacon Impex and Masood Textile Mills, both Hugo Boss suppliers.

Polish retailer LPP was also targeted by labour organisers for choosing not to renew the accord, and has not responded to requests for comment. On the news of Hugo Boss’s return, the Clean Clothes Campaign called it a victory and urged LPP to follow, citing outstanding safety fixes across its own network of 100 supplier factories.

We covered Hugo Boss’s ownership saga as Frasers Group took control of the company with a 50.08% stake, and later as Michael Murray, Mike Ashley’s son-in-law and Frasers’ chief executive, was confirmed as supervisory board chairman, replacing Stephan Sturm. The safety reversal is the first major supply-chain decision under that new control.

Union reaction

Christina Hajagos-Clausen, textile sector director at IndustriALL and one of the Accord’s negotiators, said the union is pleased to welcome Hugo Boss back. She said it looks forward to continuing work within the company’s suppliers so the workers making its clothes go to safe factories and can use the complaints mechanism for remedy.

Dominique Muller, UK policy lead at Labour Behind the Label, said she only wished it had not taken so much energy for Hugo Boss to “do the right thing.” She argued the Accord is widely regarded as the most effective factory safety tool, pairing independent inspection with penalties that bind brands rather than relying on voluntary audits.

Muller said the earlier decision suggested Hugo Boss thought a commitment to health and safety at work was negotiable, and that it is not. Years of voluntary monitoring and for-profit auditing, she said, had failed most workers, leaving legally binding agreements and an end to union repression as the only path to real change.

Hugo Boss will re-join the Accord on 1 January 2027, leaving nearly a year before the commitment resumes in full. The company has not said what changed between its January exit and the October decision, nor whether it faces any conditions linked to the unresolved findings at its eight contracted factories.

Support the content you love — it’s free 🎉

Add Worthbury as a preferred source on Google. Our stories will be more likely to appear in Google’s Top Stories. It’s free and supports our team. Thank you!

Add as preferred source

You can remove us any time in Google’s source preferences.

This briefing is published daily using an AI-powered system crafted by Worthbury's team and finely tuned to meet our editorial standards. While we continuously test and review the output, mistakes can sometimes happen. Tell us if you spot one.