Vogue's first September issue under Chloe Malle drops the trend bible for a keepsake
The issue's Botox and jaw-clenching features have left even a longtime subscriber asking what she was reading.
Vogue has published its September issue, the magazine's flagship edition and the first produced under Chloe Malle, who became head of editorial content a year ago after Anna Wintour stepped back from the role.
The cover pairs Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere, both children of well-known parents, a casting choice that mirrors Malle's own background as the daughter of actress Candice Bergen and filmmaker Louis Malle.
That theme extends beyond the cover. The issue links its portrait of famous offspring to the wave of designers who have taken over at legacy fashion houses over the past year, a subject the magazine treats as a running thread through the issue's features.
What the issue actually reads like
Vogue is a fashion and lifestyle magazine that has shaped the industry since its founding in 1892, and its September issue has traditionally been the one that told readers what was coming into style. This year's edition breaks with that job description.
On the Glossy Podcast, hosted by senior fashion reporter Danny Parisi and editor-in-chief Jill Manoff, the pair broke down Malle's first September issue and what it says about where both Vogue and fashion media are heading.
Manoff, a longtime Vogue subscriber, said she found herself reading a feature on improving mood with Botox and another on the dangers of clenching one's jaw. "I was just like, what am I reading here?" she said of the shift away from the buzzy, newsy content she once expected from the title.
Parisi pointed to a structural reason for that drift. Print magazines are increasingly bought as collector's items or coffee-table objects rather than sources of timely information, which explains the commemorative issues now stacked in grocery aisles rather than genuine trend forecasting.
Timely style reporting has largely moved online, where publishing speed beats print's production schedule. That leaves a September issue that carries advertising from brands that are commercially hot right now beside editorial features that feel detached from the fashion business itself.
Manoff noted that Malle's own background is part of the story. Malle comes from digital media rather than the print features desk that shaped Wintour's decades running the title, and the hosts said that background is visible in how this issue is put together.
The clothes are their own signal about where Vogue's editorial direction is. This issue continues a move toward single-brand, head-to-toe looks rather than the stylist-driven mixes that once filled its pages.
Manoff said she misses the old model. "I like when you see 'stylist-owned ball cap' or 'vintage jeans' in the credits," she said, arguing that those mixed, personal styling choices were more inspiring than a single designer's full look, since nobody actually dresses head to toe in one brand.
The magazine is no longer positioning itself as the place readers go to learn what is new.
Instead, the September issue functions closer to an archive object, one built to be kept rather than consulted, which is a different proposition to advertisers than the trend bible Wintour's Vogue represented for decades.
We have not previously covered Vogue's editorial leadership change or this issue, so this is our first look at how Malle's Vogue differs in practice from the magazine under Wintour, beyond the personnel change itself.
The cover story's framing of children who inherited famous names gives Malle's Vogue a way to comment on succession in fashion houses without naming the individual designers directly, folding her own biography into the magazine's broader argument.
Neither the podcast nor Vogue has said whether September's approach, heavier on wellness features and single-brand styling, will carry through to future issues or was specific to this transition year under Malle.
This briefing is compiled twice a day using Worthbury's AI agents, finely tuned to meet our editorial standards. While we test and review their work, mistakes can sometimes happen. See exactly how it works.